![Natural Is Better”: How the Appeal To Nature Fallacy Derails Public Health - By Sofia Deleniv, Dan Ariely, & Kelly Peters - Behavioral Scientist Natural Is Better”: How the Appeal To Nature Fallacy Derails Public Health - By Sofia Deleniv, Dan Ariely, & Kelly Peters - Behavioral Scientist](https://behavioralscientist.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/natural-deleniv_.jpg)
Natural Is Better”: How the Appeal To Nature Fallacy Derails Public Health - By Sofia Deleniv, Dan Ariely, & Kelly Peters - Behavioral Scientist
![Thinking Is Power on Twitter: "@jonathanstea Appeal to nature is one of the most common fallacies in alternative medicine, wellness, etc. One you can spot it the house of cards starts to Thinking Is Power on Twitter: "@jonathanstea Appeal to nature is one of the most common fallacies in alternative medicine, wellness, etc. One you can spot it the house of cards starts to](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_uRrc0XsAI2lv-.jpg)
Thinking Is Power on Twitter: "@jonathanstea Appeal to nature is one of the most common fallacies in alternative medicine, wellness, etc. One you can spot it the house of cards starts to
![Pin by Marcia Jones on Thinking Rhetoric Logical Fallacy | Philosophy theories, Logical fallacies, Rhetoric Pin by Marcia Jones on Thinking Rhetoric Logical Fallacy | Philosophy theories, Logical fallacies, Rhetoric](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/df/bd/2f/dfbd2f4318807206d1c32b5678f1aef6.jpg)
Pin by Marcia Jones on Thinking Rhetoric Logical Fallacy | Philosophy theories, Logical fallacies, Rhetoric
![Viewpoint: Challenging the 'appeal to nature' fallacy — Is being anti-GMO pro-starvation? - Genetic Literacy Project Viewpoint: Challenging the 'appeal to nature' fallacy — Is being anti-GMO pro-starvation? - Genetic Literacy Project](https://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/o-yemi-tubi-edit-pkznb8x574g7keeerbzo0pf78b339f3q27qb36jzik.jpg)
Viewpoint: Challenging the 'appeal to nature' fallacy — Is being anti-GMO pro-starvation? - Genetic Literacy Project
![Your logical fallacy is < y > appeal to nature You argued that because something is 'natural it is therefore valid, justified, inevitable, good or ideal. Many 'natural' things are also considered ' Your logical fallacy is < y > appeal to nature You argued that because something is 'natural it is therefore valid, justified, inevitable, good or ideal. Many 'natural' things are also considered '](https://img.ifunny.co/images/b0b3109718add5164eb04e107477883d68ea34e86cba3d18cc87ebaa81854458_1.jpg)